In a recent legal development, mixed martial artist Conor McGregor has been ordered by the High Court to pay additional legal costs. This decision stems from a dispute over the dissemination of CCTV footage related to a civil case in which McGregor was found liable for raping Nikita Hand in December 2018. ​

Background: The Civil Case and Verdict on Conor McGregor

In late 2024, a civil jury found McGregor liable for sexually assaulting Ms. Hand at a Dublin hotel in December 2018, awarding her €250,000 in damages. McGregor has consistently denied the allegations, asserting that the encounter was consensual, and has expressed intentions to appeal the verdict.

The Controversy Over CCTV Footage

Central to the trial was CCTV footage from the Beacon Hotel, capturing interactions between McGregor, Ms. Hand, co-defendant James Lawrence, and Ms. Hand’s colleague on the day of the incident. This footage was presented multiple times during the trial and was integral to the proceedings. ​

In January 2025, the High Court issued an order prohibiting McGregor from disseminating the CCTV footage and mandated that he return or destroy any copies in his possession. This order was prompted by social media comments from Gabriel Ernesto Rapisarda, identified as a business associate of McGregor, suggesting that the footage would be released publicly. ​

McGregor’s Actions and Court’s Response

Despite the court’s clear directive, McGregor reposted comments hinting at the potential release of the footage. This action led Ms. Hand’s legal team to seek further injunctions to prevent any dissemination. McGregor submitted multiple affidavits asserting his compliance with the court’s order, stating that he had neither shared the footage nor facilitated its release by others, and had deleted all copies in his possession.

Judge’s Ruling and Implications

On March 6, 2025, Mr. Justice Alex Owens reviewed the affidavits and acknowledged McGregor’s compliance with the original order. However, he noted that McGregor was the “author of his own misfortune” due to his actions on social media, which necessitated additional legal proceedings. Consequently, the court ordered McGregor to cover the legal costs incurred by Ms. Hand’s legal team in addressing this matter.

Broader Impact and Public Perception

This case has attracted significant public attention, not only due to McGregor’s high-profile status but also because of the serious nature of the allegations. The court’s decision underscores the importance of adhering to legal directives, especially in cases involving sensitive material. It also highlights the potential repercussions of social media activity on legal proceedings.​

Conclusion

Conor McGregor’s recent legal challenges serve as a reminder of the complexities inherent in high-profile civil cases. The court’s ruling emphasizes the necessity for all parties to comply strictly with legal orders and the potential consequences of actions perceived as undermining the judicial process. As McGregor prepares to appeal the civil verdict, this additional legal cost adds another layer to his ongoing legal battles.

For more stories and insights, visit It’s On

Instagram:@itson.ie

TikTok videos and information:@itson.ie