Doubts Rise Over J-Foy’s Claim That His Grandpa Was the Zodiac Killer
The Zodiac Killer case is one of the most infamous and unsolved mysteries in American history, leaving the world intrigued for over half a century. Recently, Jeremy Foy, a former police officer, gained massive attention online by claiming that his late grandfather, Richard Hoffman, was the elusive Zodiac Killer. Foy has posted a series of TikTok videos outlining his supposed evidence, even teasing that a documentary will soon reveal everything and finally solve the case. (Read our article on this here.)
However, as with many bold claims that gain traction on social media, not everyone is convinced. Redditors have been particularly vocal in casting doubt on Foy’s story, with users picking apart his narrative and questioning the authenticity of his evidence.
A Redditor’s Skepticism: “Why Jeremy Foy is Likely Not Telling the Truth”
One of the most detailed critiques came from a Redditor named NickyGi, who posted a lengthy breakdown of why they believe Foy’s claims are dubious at best. In their post, they outlined several key reasons for their skepticism, starting with the glaring issue of how Foy is choosing to reveal his so-called evidence.
“If Jeremy Foy really had actual evidence—not just circumstantial stuff, but legitimate proof that could finally close one of the biggest serial killer mysteries in American history—would he really reveal it all in a documentary first?” – Redditor NickyGi
NickyGi raises an excellent point. If Foy genuinely had the “key” to solving the Zodiac Killer case, it seems odd that his first step would be to make TikTok videos and announce a documentary. Wouldn’t the first logical move be to take the evidence to law enforcement, particularly given that the case is still technically open?
The Concerns Over Legal Implications
Another point of contention raised by Reddit users like NickyGi is the potential legal implications of Foy’s actions. If his evidence is as solid as he claims, why hasn’t he consulted with a criminal attorney? After all, unveiling evidence about a 56-year-old murder case could have serious consequences, especially if it involves someone as high-profile as the Zodiac Killer.
In their post, NickyGi asked some pressing questions:
- – Has Jeremy Foy consulted a lawyer about the legal risks of going public with this information?
- – Why hasn’t he approached law enforcement before turning to social media and the public?
These are significant concerns. Releasing crucial evidence without going through the proper legal channels could complicate any investigation. For evidence to be credible in a legal setting, law enforcement must establish a chain of custody—essentially a record that shows the evidence hasn’t been tampered with or contaminated.
Once this information is released publicly, as Foy has already done through TikTok, the credibility of any potential evidence could be compromised.
“For evidence to even be admissible in court, law enforcement needs to establish a proper chain of custody. If it’s made public first, the authenticity and handling of the evidence could be questioned, which could undermine its credibility in legal proceedings.” – NickyGi
J-Foy on TikTok
Is It All For Fame?
This brings up another significant concern: Is Jeremy Foy chasing fame or trying to solve a mystery? According to NickyGi and other Redditors, the fact that Foy chose TikTok as his platform to make the claim raises more questions than answers. Social media fame can be intoxicating, and many users have pointed out that jumping straight to TikTok and announcing a documentary reeks of a publicity stunt.
“It’s hard to trust someone whose first move is making TikTok videos about something this serious. Honestly, it just makes me think he’s doing it for fame or money.” – NickyGi
The comment reflects a growing suspicion among internet sleuths that Foy’s claims might not be as genuine as they appear. After all, countless people have come forward over the years claiming to know the identity of the Zodiac Killer, only for their stories to fall apart under scrutiny.
Can Documentaries Really Solve Crimes?
Another argument from NickyGi and other Redditors is the question of whether a documentary is the appropriate vehicle for solving a case like this. While true crime documentaries have garnered huge audiences in recent years, they rarely—if ever—lead to concrete resolutions. In fact, they often spark new conspiracy theories and lead to more questions than answers.
“Have you ever seen a documentary that has actually solved a case anywhere in the world? There are so many red flags suggesting that his story is just another of the many we’ve heard over the years.” – NickyGi
It’s a fair question. Documentaries are typically retrospective, analysing already available evidence rather than breaking new ground. If Foy truly had groundbreaking evidence, presenting it in a documentary seems like an unusual approach for something that could alter American criminal history.
The Verdict? Reddit’s Not Convinced
Reddit, as always, is a place where scepticism thrives. While some users are intrigued by Foy’s claims and are curious to see what his documentary will reveal, the general consensus seems to be that his story doesn’t quite add up.
As NickyGi and others have pointed out, if Foy were truly interested in solving the Zodiac case, there are far more direct and effective ways to go about it than by creating viral TikTok videos. The internet may be captivated for now, but as the release of the documentary draws closer, it will be interesting to see whether Foy can back up his claims—or if this will be just another dead end in the long, twisting saga of the Zodiac Killer.
Thank you for your opinion NickyGi!
Share this content:
