In a recent High Court case, former Limerick senior hurler Mark Keane has filed a lawsuit against his employer, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care (Ireland), alleging severe injuries sustained during a workplace incident in September 2018. Keane claims that the injuries have left him unable to work and significantly impacted his quality of life. However, evidence presented during the trial suggests that Keane engaged in extensive cycling activities post-incident, raising questions about the extent of his alleged disabilities.​

The Incident: A Heroic Act Gone Awry

On September 10, 2018, while working as a technician at Johnson & Johnson’s plant in the National Technological Park, Plassey, Co Limerick, Keane responded to a distress call from a colleague whose arm was trapped in a machine. In his attempt to assist, Keane’s right hand became caught, resulting in injuries to his finger, shoulder, and back. His legal team describes him as a “rescuer” who suffered “a very serious injury” leading to “extensive damage.” ​

Claims of Debilitating Pain and Loss

Keane asserts that the injuries have rendered him unable to work, deprived him of his passion for hurling, and caused significant psychological distress. He reports constant pain, a frozen shoulder, and a loss of grip strength. Financially, he claims to have been earning €1,300 weekly before the incident and has since been unemployed. ​

Contradictory Evidence: The Cycling Activities

Despite these claims, Johnson & Johnson’s defense presented evidence indicating that Keane participated in cycling events covering distances up to 105 kilometers post-incident. This revelation challenges the severity of his alleged disabilities and raises concerns about the credibility of his claims. ​

Legal Implications and Employer’s Defense

Johnson & Johnson denies the allegations of negligence, arguing that Keane’s injuries were self-inflicted during his voluntary intervention. The company contends that it provided a safe working environment and that Keane’s actions were outside the scope of his duties. The defense also questions the authenticity of Keane’s reported disabilities, citing his cycling activities as evidence of physical capability.​

Public Perception and Media Coverage

The case has attracted significant media attention, with reports highlighting the contrast between Keane’s injury claims and his post-incident physical activities. Public opinion appears divided, with some expressing sympathy for Keane’s situation, while others question the legitimacy of his claims in light of the presented evidence.​

As the trial progresses, the court must carefully evaluate the evidence to determine the legitimacy of Keane’s claims and the extent of Johnson & Johnson’s liability. This case underscores the complexities involved in personal injury lawsuits, particularly when evidence contradicts the plaintiff’s assertions.

For more stories and insights, visit It’s On

Instagram:@itson.ie

TikTok videos and information:@itson.ie