An Irish Member of the European Parliament (MEP) has recently taken a strong stance on ending the EU-wide biannual daylight saving time (DST) changes, calling them outdated and increasingly impractical.

With roots in energy conservation efforts from over a century ago, the practice of adjusting clocks twice a year is now being scrutinised across Europe for its modern-day effects.

The Push for Change

The MEP’s campaign comes in response to growing evidence that these clock changes disrupt public health, mental wellbeing, and productivity. Studies suggest that the sudden shift can impact circadian rhythms, leading to sleep disturbances and increased stress for many.

Northern European countries, in particular, have raised concerns, as daylight saving provides little additional sunlight in the evenings during their extended winter months. This call to action aligns with similar movements across the EU, advocating for either a permanent standard time or year-round “summer time” to simplify life for residents.

Public and Political Support

The campaign is gaining traction, with supporters arguing that permanent time settings could improve people’s routines, reduce health risks associated with sudden time changes, and promote economic stability. Critics, however, remain divided on whether the standard time should lean towards summer or winter hours, as this could have varying implications on industries, particularly agriculture and tourism.

Next Steps for the EU

The European Commission had previously proposed ending DST changes in 2018, but the plan stalled due to political debate among member states. This new campaign led by the Irish MEP may reignite the conversation, encouraging countries to revisit the proposal with an emphasis on individual countries’ needs.

As discussions unfold, Ireland’s stance could shape the future of daylight saving time across Europe, potentially signalling the end of an era and offering a more streamlined approach to time management across the continent.