The case of Luigi Mangione, dubbed the “CEO Killer”, has sparked intense debate both in legal circles and on social media. The 26-year-old Maryland native stands accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, allegedly motivated by deep frustrations with America’s healthcare system. However, rather than widespread condemnation, Mangione has amassed an unusual cult-like following online. His supporters have flooded social media with messages of admiration, raising over $615,000 for his legal defence and even sending him personal photographs while he awaits trial in a Brooklyn federal jail.

Why Is the Internet Obsessed?

Mangione’s background is strikingly different from the typical criminal narrative. An Ivy League-educated young man from a wealthy family, his alleged crime starkly contrasts with his privileged upbringing. This juxtaposition of intellect and violence has captivated the public, turning him into an anti-hero for those disillusioned with corporate greed and the privatised healthcare system.

His alleged manifesto, railing against healthcare profiteering, resonates with many, further fuelling his growing fan base. Some supporters argue that his actions highlight a broken system and see him as a symbol of resistance, despite the fact he has been charged with murder and terrorism-related offences that could lead to the death penalty.

The Ethics of Idolising Alleged Criminals

While true crime fascination is nothing new, romanticising or idolising alleged murderers raises serious ethical concerns. Is it morally justifiable to turn someone accused of a violent crime into a pop culture figure?

For one, this fervour can be deeply insensitive to the victim’s family, overshadowing the real tragedy – the loss of an innocent life. Additionally, it creates a dangerous precedent where criminal actions are glorified, potentially inspiring others to seek notoriety through violence.

Psychologists suggest that the obsession with criminals like Mangione stems from a mix of morbid curiosity, rebellion against authority, and the allure of a ‘misunderstood’ figure. The internet amplifies this phenomenon, allowing narratives to be shaped in ways that blur the lines between fact and fiction.

Is Social Media to Blame?

Social media platforms have played a crucial role in fuelling Mangione’s cult-like status. Fan pages, viral TikTok videos, and Twitter threads have transformed his image from an alleged murderer to a revolutionary figure. Algorithms prioritise engaging content, meaning that controversial topics like his case are pushed to the forefront of online discussions, further embedding his name in digital culture.

This isn’t the first time an alleged criminal has received public adoration. Similar cases include Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez, and the “Hot Felon” Jeremy Meeks, all of whom gained significant female followings despite their criminal backgrounds. However, the difference today is the speed and scale at which these obsessions develop, thanks to the internet.

Should We Reconsider How We Engage With True Crime?

The Luigi Mangione case is a stark reminder of how quickly public perception can be distorted in the digital age. While discussing true crime can be an important tool for raising awareness about societal issues, crossing the line into idolisation of alleged criminals is deeply problematic.

As the legal proceedings continue, it is crucial to maintain focus on justice rather than sensationalism. Instead of romanticising figures like Mangione, public discourse should centre on the broader implications of crime, corporate ethics, and the mental health crises that often contribute to such cases.

The question remains: Should the internet be obsessing over an alleged murderer, or should we redirect our attention to more meaningful conversations?

Stay informed with itson.ie.