A hotel manager who was fired for bullying a gay colleague has been awarded €3,000 by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC)—not because the dismissal was wrong, but because the employer failed to offer an appeal process. The case has sparked widespread debate over the balance between disciplinary action and procedural fairness in the Irish workplace.

The incident unfolded at a prominent Irish hotel, where the manager had worked for more than 13 years. Over a period of months, he was accused of harassing a younger, openly gay colleague through mockery, verbal jabs, and physical interference. According to multiple witnesses, the manager repeatedly mimicked the staff member’s voice and walk, misused pronouns, and ridiculed his mannerisms in front of guests and staff.

Multiple Witnesses Backed Claims

The situation escalated to a formal complaint, prompting an internal investigation. Several staff backed the allegations, detailing what one described as “relentless, targeted harassment” during busy service hours. Another said the manager “seemed to enjoy making the young man uncomfortable, especially in front of others.”

It was also revealed during the WRC hearing that the manager had on one occasion physically stopped the staff member from carrying out a task, which the commission described as an unacceptable breach of conduct. The investigation concluded that the behaviour constituted workplace bullying and warranted immediate dismissal.

WRC: Dismissal Fair, But Procedure Flawed

While the WRC accepted that the manager had engaged in bullying and that the hotel was within its rights to terminate his employment, the adjudicator highlighted a critical oversight: the absence of an appeal process.

“The lack of an opportunity to appeal rendered the dismissal procedurally unfair,” the adjudicator ruled. “Although the conduct merited dismissal, the failure to allow for appeal undermines the fairness of the overall process.”

As a result, the WRC awarded €3,000 in compensation—not as a reversal of the dismissal, but as a financial penalty for the hotel’s procedural misstep. The ruling made it clear that no sympathy was being extended to the manager over his actions, stating, “This is a case where both the misconduct and the lack of appeal need to be independently addressed.”

Legal Experts Weigh In

Employment law experts have since commented on the ruling. One solicitor familiar with employment tribunals remarked, “This case should act as a red flag to employers. Even when wrongdoing is clear-cut, skipping procedural steps like appeals can result in costly mistakes.”

The adjudication highlights the principle that procedural fairness must be upheld even when dealing with serious breaches of conduct. Employers must act swiftly to protect staff—but must also respect the legal framework of fair dismissal.

Reaction and Consequences

The case has stirred mixed reactions among the public. Some have expressed outrage that someone found guilty of bullying would receive compensation, even if only for a procedural error. Others argue that all employees, regardless of the circumstances, are entitled to due process.

The complainant, who remains employed at the hotel, was praised for speaking out and has reportedly been supported by colleagues and management. Since the ruling, the hotel has revised its HR processes to ensure future disciplinary actions include the right to appeal. Diversity and inclusion training has also been implemented across all departments.

Lessons for Employers Across Ireland

This case is a powerful reminder that employers cannot cut corners—even when handling severe cases of misconduct. Summary dismissals must still follow correct protocol, or organisations risk being penalised.

The WRC’s decision reinforces two critical standards: bullying in the workplace will not be tolerated, and the rights of both accuser and accused must be upheld through robust, transparent procedures.

For more stories and insights, visit It’s On

Instagram:@itson.ie

TikTok videos and information:@itson.ie